2016

Toomey v. Northern Trust Co., 182 So. 3d 891 (Fla. 3d DCA 2016).

The firm represented beneficiaries to a high-profile, multimillion dollar estate who were seeking to overturn a protective order preventing them from deposing witnesses in an effort to preserve their testimony. Despite the discretionary legal standard that generally rejects appeals from orders denying discovery, the firm prevailed in demonstrating that its clients were irreparably harmed by the protective order.

Toomey v. Northern Trust Co., 182 So. 3d 891 (Fla. 3d DCA 2016). Read More »